
Voices from the Canopy: An AI Tree Rewrites Youth–Nature Relations
Agency for Nature’s AI-powered talking tree is a public engagement project built around a living, 150-year-old horse chestnut in London’s Morden Hill Park. The installation integrates over ten environmental and biofeedback sensors—measuring wind speed, soil moisture, humidity, and bioelectrical signals—whose streams modulate a large language model to generate a distinctive “tree” persona. The campaign launched with a 30-second film, set to Cosmo Sheldrake’s Soil (feat. NATURE), distributed across cinemas, online channels, and ITV. Future phases promise public access to live conversations with the tree, evolving the project from spectacle to participatory interface.
The core participants are urban young people who report low felt connection to nature, along with educators, park visitors, and media audiences encountering the film. By positioning nature alongside music, fashion, and gaming, the initiative reframes environmental engagement as a culturally legitimate practice within youth scenes. The broader significance lies in redefining environmental communication: from moralizing campaigns to relational, real-time dialogue that renders the nonhuman as an addressable social actor.
The installation operationalizes more-than-human mediation, translating sensor-derived “affects” into a narrative voice that fits platform-era attention ecologies. It exemplifies infrastructural storytelling: datafication of a living organism becomes a dramaturgical scaffolding for identity work among youth audiences. The LLM functions as a cultural interface that converts ecological signals into socially intelligible cues, leveraging parasocial interaction to catalyze place attachment. As a designed “game of conversation,” it gamifies environmental presence—rewarding curiosity and turn-taking—thus reorienting motivations via lightweight status and intimacy cues common to platform cultures. Yet the project also surfaces tensions: anthropomorphic framing risks instrumentalizing the tree’s alterity, and algorithmic personality design may aestheticize ecological crisis while obscuring the politics of land use and access. Still, by aligning environmental meaning-making with vernacular media grammars, the campaign prototypes an ethics of encounter that can scaffold durable habits—visitation, observation, stewardship—beyond the screen. The key is maintaining provenance transparency, preventing techno-mystification, and embedding pathways from encounter to action.
Practical Implications for Organizations
- Build “living data” interfaces: translate sensory or operational data into narrative agents that audiences can address, not just observe.
- Design for parasocial sustainability: craft consistent, bounded personalities that invite repeat engagement while avoiding deceptive anthropomorphism.
- Integrate cultural codes: pair environmental or technical content with music, fashion, and gaming aesthetics to enter youth meaning systems.
- Close the action loop: attach clear micro-conversions (visit, volunteer, adopt-a-tree, citizen science) to each interaction.
- Ensure provenance and safety: disclose data sources, model limits, and moderation protocols; protect locations to prevent ecological harm.
- Prototype in public, then localize: pilot a flagship experience, then adapt personas and scripts to community ecologies, languages, and access needs.
- Measure beyond impressions: track shifts in place attachment, revisit frequency, and stewardship behaviors, not only media reach.
- Co-govern with stakeholders: involve ecologists, educators, and youth councils in persona design, consent, and data governance.
Consumer tribes that may relate to this case study:



